Kuldeep Sharma
- Sep 14, 2022
- 1 min read

Why are Lord Ram and Lord Krishna thinking differently?

The recent verdicts under the IBC of different benches of the Supreme Court are at variance with each other, as observed in the case of Rainbow Papers Ltd , where the Apex Court's verdict leads to an inference that IBC does not supersede the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, whereas in ABG Shipyard, the Apex Court has opined that IBC would prevail over the Customs Act.

With section 238 of the IBC in place, which clearly states that provisions of this Code are to override other laws, it would be appropriate for all stakeholders to read the lines of the Code rather than reading in-between the lines.

A Look into SC’s Dissimilar Verdicts on IBC Supremacy

.pdf

Download PDF • 119KB

Recent Posts

See All

The Two-Pillar Solution to stimulate APAs

In the backdrop of the recent releases of Public Consultation Documents by the OECD on Amount B under Pillar One and Tax Certainty for the GloBE Rules under Pillar Two, it is expected that a common st

Apex Court Verdict in Vidarbha Industries - Adding to IBC Woes?

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) in the case of Vidarbha Power Industries Pvt Ltd has held that under section 7(5)(a), the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which is the Adjudicating Authority (AA),

Pillar Two must Align with India's FDI Vision

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is one of the compelling needs of a developing economy. One of its key achievements of Hon’ble Narendra Modi government is that more than 50 percent of the FDI India ha

Post: Blog2_Post